Editorial
Editorial Standards
Verified. Sourced. On the Record.
Surveillance Intelligence Asia operates on a single principle: every claim must be traceable to its source. What follows is how we operationalize that principle: the verification tiers, sourcing rules, corrections policy, contributor standards and editorial independence boundaries that govern every page on this site.
How we grade evidence: four-tier verification
Every fact-bearing entry on the site carries one of four badges. The badge tells the reader what kind of claim they are reading, before they read a word of it.
Verified
Drawn from a government, regulator, court, intergovernmental document or from a listed company’s own regulatory filing. The source is named and linked.
Reported
Drawn from established reporting or awaiting independent regulator confirmation: credible, but provisional. Anything that cannot meet the Verified test is marked this way and says so plainly.
Analysis
Professional commentary by a named contributor. Clearly marked as opinion: never presented as fact.
Advisory
Professional guidance drawn from operational experience: recommendations and practice rather than factual claims. This content carries the toolkit line and The Desk.
Sourcing standards
Primary source preference: government, regulator, court and intergovernmental documents, and a listed company’s own regulatory filings, take precedence over secondary reporting.
Dual source rule for material claims: two independent sources required before a claim is published as fact.
On the record: no anonymous claims unless legal or safety considerations justify it, and only with editor sign-off.
Full attribution: every fact-bearing entry names where it came from.
Context preservation: quotes, dates and figures must not be detached from the circumstances that give them meaning.
Corrections
Material errors fixed within 24 hours, with an editor’s note appended showing what changed.
Clerical errors (typos, formatting) fixed silently.
Correction requests reviewed within 48 hours of receipt.
A public correction log is maintained at /corrections.
Contributors
Direct industry experience required for surveillance, compliance and operations contributions.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure on every byline, kept current.
Adherence to the four-tier verification badge system on every fact-bearing claim.
Editorial review before publication: no contributor publishes directly.
Prohibited content
No consumer gambling tips, betting strategies, or odds-style content.
No promotion of gambling to the general public.
No unverified rumors presented as fact.
Nothing that compromises active security operations or facilitates fraud.
Editorial independence
No advertising from gambling operators.
Revenue comes from products, subscriptions and consulting: never from advertisers with editorial influence.
Questions about how a claim is sourced, or about a specific badge on a page? editor@surveillanceasia.com. To file a correction, see /corrections.